Homology-directed repair (HDR) with a plasmid donor

Considerations for successful HDR experimental design

Genome engineering with HDR

Homology-directed repair (HDR) is a process where a DNA double-strand break (DSB) is repaired by homologous recombination using a DNA template. This template can come from within the cell during late S phase or G2 phase of the cell cycle, when sister chromatids are available prior to the completion of mitosis. Additionally, exogenous repair templates can be delivered into a cell, most often in the form of a synthetic, single-strand DNA donor oligo or donor plasmid, to generate a precise change in the genome.

Use of plasmid donor for HDR

Plasmid donor repair template is delivered into a cell to insert or change large sequences (knock-in a fluorescent reporter or replace an entire gene) of DNA in the endogenous genomic target region.

Design considerations for HDR using plasmid donors

To design a DNA donor plasmid for precise gene editing using HDR, one must consider:

  • The distance of the intended HDR insertion site (or alteration site) from the Cas9 cut site
  • The gRNA efficiency near a specific insertion site
  • The length of homology arms
  • Disruption of the CRISPR targeting site if it is present in the plasmid donor repair template

Here we describe designing HDR plasmid donors for use with the CRISPR-Cas9 system; general principles can be applied to any site-directed nuclease.

Insertion site and cut site distance

In mammalian cells, HDR has highest efficiency when the insertion site and the DSB are within ten nucleotides proximity. HDR efficiencies drop quickly as this distance increases (1).

Selecting gRNAs for maximal HDR efficiency at a specific insertion site

Since HDR efficiency is relatively low compared to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair of DSBs, it is important to choose a gRNA with the highest possible DNA cutting efficiency. An NHEJ-mediated efficiency of at least 25% is recommended. This is because the precise HDR-mediated repair will only occur in a fraction of DSBs that are available.

Additionally, not every insertion site will have PAM sequences within the surrounding 20 nt, or the assessed gRNA efficiency with available PAM sites might be very low. In these circumstances, choose the most active gRNA that is as close as possible to the intended insertion site. Again, be aware that HDR has highest efficiency when the insertion site and the DSB are within ten nucleotides from one another (1).

Length of homology arms for a plasmid donor

Homology arm length for a plasmid donor typically ranges from 500 to 1000 nt (2-4).

Design a plasmid donor

The following are basic design considerations that are automatically incorporated when using the HDR Donor Designer.

Retrieving a genomic sequence

An annotated genomic sequence is required to begin designing a plasmid donor. When selecting the genomic sequence, it is essential to retrieve the genomic sequence (introns and exons) and not, for example the mRNA sequence, so that your DNA template correctly repairs the intended HDR modification site.

Determine the insertion location

The insertion location should be within the endogenous gene of the target protein. Ideally, the insertion site should be precisely after the start codon for an N-terminal insertion, or conversely, immediately before the stop codon for a C-terminal insertion.

Primer design to amplify homology arms

When designing PCR primers to amplify the homology arms of your intended gene target, the chosen insertion site indicates the start location of the insert adjacent primers (Figure 1). The distance that the corresponding primer pair is away from the insertion site determines the length of the respective homology arm. Additionally, for proper ligation-free assembly into a plasmid donor, adapter sequences are appended to the gene specific portion of the primers (Figure 1, red or orange rectangles).

Homology arm primer design for generating a mKate2 donor plasmid in-frame with your target gene

Homology Arm Primer Design

Figure 1. The gRNA target or Protospacer and PAM sequences are outlined in black in a zoomed in view on the left. The cut site and insertion site are indicated by arrows. The start codon (ATG) is highlighted in light green. Colors on the zoomed out diagram to the right indicate the origin of the DNA (dark blue = 5' homology arm, light blue = 3' homology arm, red = mKate2 fluorescent reporter sequence, orange = plasmid backbone).

Avoiding CRISPR-Cas9 cutting of a gene locus after HDR

When designing a donor plasmid, it is essential to disrupt the CRISPR target site when it occurs within your donor template. Failure to disrupt the CRISPR target site will allow Cas9 to cut your HDR-edited gene locus after the repair has taken place. This can be accomplished with one or more of the following changes to the donor template (Figure 2): (1) design the donor plasmid so that the DNA insertion splits the 20 nucleotide CRISPR target sequence, or a portion of the target sequence, and the corresponding PAM, or (2) introduce silent mutations in the PAM or CRISPR target region by introducing one or more nucleotide changes in the appropriate gene-specific insert-adjacent homology arm primer.

Design strategies to aviod CRISPR-Cas9 cutting after HDR-mediated insertion using a donor plasmid

Design Strategies CRISPR cas9 Cutting HDR

Figure 2. The gRNA target sequence is highlighted in gray and the PAM sequence in red. The start codon (ATG) is highlighted in light green. Silent mutations in primer sequences are colored dark green and indicated with an asterisk. Colors on the diagram indicate the origin of the DNA (dark blue = 5' homology, light blue = 3' homology, red = mKate2 fluorescent reporter sequence.

Featured Products

Featured Resources

References

  1. B. Elliott, C. Richardson, et al. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18(1), 93-101 (1998)
  2. R. Mahen, B. Koch, et al. Comparative assessment of fluorescent transgene methods for quantitative imaging in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 25(22), 3610–3618 (2014)
  3. F. Merkle, W. Neuhausser, et al. Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Generation of Knockin Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Lacking Undesired Mutations at the Targeted Locus. Cell Reports. 11(6), 875-883 (2015)
  4. M. Ratz, I. Testa, et al. CRISPR /Cas9-mediated endogenous protein tagging for RESOLFT super-resolution microscopy of living human cells. Scientific Reports. 5(9592),1-6 (2015)